How to increase VO2max through Interval Training: Evidence Based Strategies for Endurance Athletes| Shift to Strength

If you're a runner who's hit a performance plateau despite logging countless miles, you're not alone. The frustration of stagnant progress despite consistent training is all too common, especially for experienced runners. This is where the power of strategic interval training comes in.

Interval training—alternating between high-intensity efforts and recovery periods—has emerged as the secret weapon for breaking through performance plateaus, particularly when it comes to increasing VO2max (your body's maximum oxygen-processing capacity). But not all interval sessions are created equal, and the wrong approach can lead to wasted effort, disappointment, or worse—injury and overtraining.

For well-trained runners, the margin for increasing VO2max gets smaller as you approach your genetic potential. The days of easy gains are gone. Now, every workout must be purposeful and precisely calibrated to stimulate further adaptations without risking burnout.

This article cuts through the confusion surrounding interval training by examining hard evidence from recent research. We'll explore exactly how to structure your intervals—from intensity and duration to recovery type—to maximize VO2max improvements even if you're already a well-trained runner. By the end, you'll have practical, science-backed strategies to break through performance barriers and reach new heights in your endurance journey.

Understanding VO2max and Its Importance

If endurance performance were a house, VO2max would be its foundation. Simply put, VO2max represents the maximum amount of oxygen your body can use during intense exercise—essentially your aerobic ceiling. When your VO2max increases, you raise the entire roof on your performance potential.

Why does this matter so much? Because oxygen is your muscles' primary fuel during endurance events. The more oxygen you can deliver and use, the faster and longer you can sustain your pace before fatigue sets in. As Bassett and Howley (1997) explain, VO2max directly influences how fast you can potentially run, regardless of your mental toughness or pain tolerance. It sets a physiological limit that willpower alone cannot overcome.

For competitive runners, a higher VO2max offers a critical advantage. While factors like running economy (your efficiency of movement) and lactate threshold (the intensity at which lactate begins to accumulate in your blood) also affect performance, a strong VO2max provides the foundation that makes improvements in these other areas more effective.

The frustrating reality for many experienced runners is that VO2max doesn't improve easily with regular training after the first few years. That's where specialized interval training becomes crucial—it provides the targeted stimulus needed to push through plateaus that traditional training can't break.

The Science Behind Interval Training

Have you ever wondered why running continuously at a easy pace stops producing results after a while? The answer lies in a fundamental principle of training: to improve, you must stress your body beyond its comfort zone. This is where interval training shines.

The brilliance of interval training is that it allows you to accumulate more high-quality work than would otherwise be possible. Think of it this way: you couldn't run at your 5K race pace for 30 minutes straight, but by breaking it into manageable chunks with recovery periods, you might be able to accumulate 15-20 minutes at that intensity.

Buchheit and Laursen (2013) demonstrated that high-intensity interval training produces similar or greater improvements in VO2max compared to easy running in significantly less time. This efficiency is a game-changer for busy athletes who can't afford to spend hours training each day.

What's actually happening in your body during these intervals? Several critical adaptations occur:

Your heart gets stronger: Interval training forces your heart to pump more blood with each beat (increased stroke volume), directly improving your cardiac output.
Your muscles develop more "highways" for oxygen: The number of capillaries feeding your muscles increases, delivering more oxygen where it's needed.
Your cellular "power plants" multiply: The mitochondria in your muscle cells—where energy is produced—increase in number and efficiency, improving your ability to use the oxygen that's delivered.
Your enzymatic machinery improves: The enzymes responsible for aerobic energy production become more abundant and efficient.

The key to triggering these adaptations lies in maximizing your time spent at or near your VO2max during workouts. Research shows that intervals that push you to at least 90% of your VO2max create the optimal stimulus for improvement. The problem many runners face is not knowing exactly how to structure their intervals to hit this sweet spot.

Active vs. Passive Recovery in Interval Training

One of the most common questions runners face when designing interval workouts is whether to keep moving during recovery periods (active recovery) or stand/walk (passive recovery). Conventional wisdom has long favoured active recovery—jogging or running slowly between hard efforts—but is this actually the best approach?

A fascinating study by Sánchez-Otero et al. (2022) challenges this conventional thinking. The researchers examined eleven well-trained male distance runners (with impressive VO2max values around 59 ml/kg/min) as they completed two different interval sessions: both involved 4 × 2 minutes at maximum aerobic speed, but one used active recovery (running at 80% of threshold pace) while the other used passive recovery (standing rest).

Runner standing on a treadmill during interval session. Using the passive recovery method

What they discovered was surprising:

Passive recovery actually allowed runners to spend slightly more time at peak VO2 levels
Active recovery resulted in higher average oxygen consumption throughout the entire session
Blood lactate levels were lower after sessions with active recovery
Critically, perceived effort was significantly lower with passive recovery

The bottom line? "Considering that passive recovery elicited lower perceptual loading for a similar cardiorespiratory response, its use would be preferable, at least, for this type of interval training sessions," concluded the researchers.

This finding could be game-changing for many runners struggling with the mental barrier of high-intensity training. If you've been dreading interval workouts because they feel overwhelming, switching to passive recovery might make these crucial sessions more manageable while delivering the same physiological benefit.

For coaches, this represents an opportunity to increase compliance with interval training programs—athletes are more likely to complete workouts that feel subjectively easier, even if the physiological stimulus remains optimal.

Optimal Interval Intensity and Duration

If you've ever stood at the track wondering exactly how fast and how long your intervals should be, you're not alone. This confusion leads many runners to either under-train (not creating enough stimulus for improvement) or overtrain (creating too much stress to recover from properly).

Runner on a treadmill during interval session. Runner is sprinting intensely.

Parmar et al. (2021) addressed this exact question in their systematic review of interval training studies with well-trained runners. After analyzing seven studies involving runners with VO2max values above 60 ml/kg/min, they identified a clear "sweet spot" for interval design:

Optimal intensity: 100% of vVO2max (the speed at which you reach your maximum oxygen consumption)
Optimal interval duration: 2-5 minutes per repetition
Optimal total volume: 15-20 minutes of accumulated time at this intensity per session

This specific combination appears to maximize the time spent at VO2max—the key driver of improvement—while still allowing sufficient volume to be completed within a single session.

Why doesn't running faster work better? Intervals performed at speeds above vVO2max (like all-out sprints) actually limit your ability to accumulate enough time at VO2max because fatigue sets in too quickly. On the flip side, intervals performed at lower intensities (like threshold pace) often fail to push well-trained runners to their VO2max at all, providing insufficient stimulus for further adaptation.

For many runners, this represents a significant shift in thinking. Instead of asking "how fast can I run these intervals?" the better question becomes "what intensity allows me to accumulate the most quality time at VO2max?". The researchers summed it up clearly: "The data presented herein suggest performing 2 to 3 interval-training sessions per week, at a work intensity of 100% vVO2max for repetitions >2 min, accumulating >15 min of total work per session."

Dose-Response Relationship in Interval Training

More is better when it comes to training, right? Not so fast. One of the most valuable contributions from Parmar et al.'s (2021) research was identifying the relationship between training dose and VO2max improvement in well-trained runners.

Using a method called training impulse (TRIMP) calculations to quantify training load across different studies, they discovered something every runner should understand: there's an optimal amount of interval training, beyond which returns diminish or even disappear.

Here's what they found:

Quality of intervals matters more than quantity: The intensity and quality of individual interval sessions had a stronger relationship with VO2max improvement than the total amount of training.
Too much volume can backfire: Excessive total training loads were associated with smaller VO2max improvements, suggesting there's a point where additional training volume becomes counterproductive.
Balance is crucial: Runners who reduced their easy training volume to accommodate high-quality interval sessions saw better improvements than those who simply added intervals on top of an already high training load.
Session training impulse is key: Higher quality individual training sessions (measured as interval training session impulse or IT STRIMP) correlated strongly with VO2max improvements.

This explains why many runners hit plateaus despite training more—they're increasing quantity while neglecting quality. The researchers concluded that "the intensity during interval sessions appears to be the likely key driver of VO2max adaptations, more so than the overall training load."

This finding offers hope to time-constrained runners: strategically implemented high-quality interval sessions may be more effective than simply logging more miles when trying to improve VO2max.

Practical Implementation for Coaches and Athletes

Let's translate the science into practical application. Based on the evidence reviewed, here's how to design optimal interval sessions for VO2max improvement.

Interval Design for VO2max Improvement

For well-trained runners, the optimal interval workout for VO2max improvement includes:

Work intensity: Run at 100% of your vVO2max (typically slightly faster than 5K race pace for most runners)
Work duration: 2-3 minutes per interval
Recovery mode: Consider passive recovery (standing or walking) to reduce perceived exertion
Recovery duration: Roughly equal to work duration; 1:1 work to rest ratio (2 minutes recovery for 2-minute intervals)
Total volume: Aim for >15 minutes of total interval work time per session
Frequency: 2-3 sessions per week during focused VO2max training phases

Are you struggling to break through a performance plateau despite putting in the miles? Professional coaching might be the missing piece in your training puzzle. A qualified coach can precisely determine your vVO2max, design customized interval sessions based on your specific physiology, and adjust your training plan based on your individual response. Contact us for a free consultation to discuss how our evidence-based coaching can help you reach the next level in your running journey.

Running Coaching

Determining Your vVO2max

To implement these recommendations, you need to know your vVO2max. Here are practical ways to determine it:

Track test: The University of Montreal Track Test involves running at progressively faster speeds (increasing by 1 km/h every 2 minutes) until exhaustion. The final completed stage represents your vVO2max.
Time trial method: A 6-minute all-out time trial provides a reasonable estimate of vVO2max for practical purposes.
Race-based calculation: For most runners, vVO2max is approximately 105-107% of current 10K race pace.

For example, if your current 10K pace is 4:00/km, your estimated vVO2max would be around 3:45-3:49/km. This is the pace you should target for your VO2max intervals.

Sample VO2max Workouts

Let's put theory into practice with three sample workouts designed to maximize VO2max improvements:

Workout 1: 2-Minute Intervals

Warm-up: 15-20 minutes easy running + 4-6 strides
Main set: 8 × 2 minutes at 100% vVO2max with 2 minutes passive recovery (standing or walking)
Cool-down: 10-15 minutes easy running
Total interval time at vVO2max: 16 minutes

Workout 2: 3-Minute Intervals

Warm-up: 15-20 minutes easy running + 4-6 strides
Main set: 5-6 × 3 minutes at 100% vVO2max with 3 minutes passive recovery
Cool-down: 10-15 minutes easy running
Total interval time at vVO2max: 15-18 minutes

Workout 3: Mixed-Duration Intervals

Warm-up: 15-20 minutes easy running + 4-6 strides
Main set:
- 3 × 3 minutes at 100% vVO2max with 3 minutes passive recovery
- 3 × 2 minutes at 100% vVO2max with 2 minutes passive recovery
Cool-down: 10-15 minutes easy running
Total interval time at vVO2max: 15 minutes

For well-trained runners, these sessions should be performed 2-3 times per week during a focused 4-6 week VO2max development phase. Crucially, reduce your easy training volume during this period to allow for proper recovery between these demanding sessions.

Periodization of Interval Training

A common mistake many runners make is trying to maintain high-intensity interval training year-round. This approach almost inevitably leads to burnout, injury, or diminishing returns. Instead, proper timing of interval training is essential.

Parmar et al. (2021) suggest that short-term training blocks (4-8 weeks) focusing on high-intensity interval training are effective for improving VO2max. However, they emphasize that "high-intensity training focused on improving VO2max should be periodized appropriately into the training regime over prolonged periods due to the stress associated with high-intensity training."

This aligns with what we observe in elite endurance athletes, who typically follow a polarized approach over the long term—about 80% of training at low intensity, with only 10-20% at high intensity.

A practical year-round approach might look like:

Base phase (8-12 weeks): One interval session weekly, focus on building aerobic base
VO2max development phase (4-6 weeks): Two to three interval sessions weekly at 100% vVO2max
Race-specific phase (4-8 weeks): Reduce pure VO2max work, increase race-specific intervals
Taper/Competition: Maintain intensity, reduce volume
Recovery phase: Minimal or no interval training

This approach allows for focused development of VO2max during specific training blocks while avoiding the overtraining risks associated with sustained high-intensity training.

Monitoring Training Load and Recovery

Even the most perfectly designed interval training program will fail if recovery isn't adequate. Many runners make the critical mistake of adding intense intervals without adjusting the rest of their training, leading to accumulated fatigue and diminished returns.

Effective monitoring doesn't require expensive technology. Consider these practical approaches:

Morning resting heart rate: A consistently elevated morning pulse (5+ beats above baseline) suggests incomplete recovery.
Session RPE: Rate your workout difficulty on a 1-10 scale and multiply by duration in minutes. Track this number weekly—a sudden increase of >20% indicates excessive loading.
Sleep quality and energy levels: Simple but powerful indicators of recovery status.
Jump testing: Regular countermovement jumps (simply jump as high as possible from a squat position) can reveal neuromuscular fatigue.

Sánchez-Otero et al. (2022) found that jump performance was actually enhanced during interval sessions regardless of recovery mode, suggesting well-designed intervals don't necessarily cause excessive neuromuscular fatigue.

If you're consistently seeing warning signs of inadequate recovery, don't hesitate to adjust. Remember, the goal is adaptation, not accumulation of training.

Uncertain if you're recovering properly between workouts or whether your current interval training is producing results? Our coaching services include comprehensive individualized recovery monitoring and training effect evaluation. We utilize both subjective and objective measures to ensure you're adapting optimally to your training. Schedule a consultation today to learn how our science-backed coaching can help you train smarter, recover better, and perform at your best when it matters most.

Running Coaching

Conclusion

For runners seeking to break through performance plateaus, properly designed interval training offers a powerful solution. The evidence we've examined reveals several key insights:

Intervals at 100% of vVO2max for 2-5 minutes appear optimal for maximizing time at VO2max and stimulating improvements.
Contrary to popular belief, passive recovery may be preferable to active recovery—it reduces perceived exertion while maintaining similar physiological stress.
Accumulating 15-20 minutes of total time at vVO2max per session provides an effective stimulus for even well-trained runners.
The quality of individual interval sessions matters more than total training volume for driving VO2max improvements.
Strategic periodization is essential—focused 4-6 week blocks of VO2max-specific interval training should be incorporated into your broader training plan.

These evidence-based strategies offer a clear path to improving VO2max, even for experienced runners who have hit plateaus with traditional training approaches. By implementing these specific interval protocols—focusing on optimal intensity, duration, recovery mode, and training frequency—you can design more effective workouts to break through barriers and reach new heights in your endurance performance.

Remember, continuous improvement in endurance performance isn't about training harder—it's about training smarter. These research-backed interval strategies provide the blueprint for doing exactly that.

References

Bassett, D. R., & Howley, E. T. (1997). Maximal oxygen uptake: "Classical" versus "contemporary" viewpoints. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 29(5), 591-603. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005768-199705000-00002

Berthon, P., Fellmann, N., Bedu, M., Beaune, B., Dabonneville, M., Coudert, J., & Chamoux, A. (1997). A 5-min running field test as a measurement of maximal aerobic velocity. European Journal of Applied Physiology and Occupational Physiology, 75(3), 233-238. https://doi.org/10.1007/s004210050153

Buchheit, M., & Laursen, P. B. (2013). High-intensity interval training, solutions to the programming puzzle: Part I: Cardiopulmonary emphasis. Sports Medicine, 43(5), 313-338. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-013-0029-x

Daniels, J. (2013). Daniels' running formula (3rd ed.). Human Kinetics.

Joyner, M. J., & Coyle, E. F. (2008). Endurance exercise performance: The physiology of champions. The Journal of Physiology, 586(1), 35-44. https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.2007.143834

Midgley, A. W., & McNaughton, L. R. (2006). Time at or near VO2max during continuous and intermittent running: A review with special reference to considerations for the optimisation of training protocols to elicit the longest time at or near VO2max. Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness, 46(1), 1-14. 16596093

Parmar, A., Jones, T. W., & Hayes, P. R. (2021). The dose-response relationship between interval-training and VO2max in well-trained endurance runners: A systematic review. Journal of Sports Sciences, 39(14), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2021.1876313

Sánchez-Otero, T., Tuimil, J. L., Boullosa, D., Varela-Sanz, A., & Iglesias-Soler, E. (2022). Active vs. passive recovery during an aerobic interval training session in well-trained runners. European Journal of Applied Physiology, 122(5), 1281-1291. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-022-04926-2

Seiler, S. (2010). What is best practice for training intensity and duration distribution in endurance athletes? International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance, 5(3), 276-291. https://doi.org/10.1123/ijspp.5.3.276

Shift to Strength